Review System

The Journal will only receive original and unpublished articles that have not been published in whole or in part in other journals. Likewise, manuscripts that have been submitted at the same time to another publication will not be accepted. After receiving the original manuscript, the Editorial Team will make a general evaluation on the adjustment of the topic to the profile of the Journal, in addition to the fulfillment of the basic rules of presentation established. All papers received comply with three stages:

1 - Review by the Editorial Team, the Editor-in-Chief or the Editors. Only those articles that meet the scientific and editorial standards, aims and scope of the Journal will be accepted.

2 - Sending to evaluators. The double-blind peer review protocol is used for the evaluation of each article, in which the authors and referees do not know each other. Each article will be evaluated by at least two experts in the subject, preferably one national and one international, who will deliver their opinion in the format established by the Journal. The opinion, after the review process, may be: a) acceptance without modifications, b) acceptance with modifications, or c) rejection, providing the reasons for it.

3 - In case of discrepancies between the two reviewers, the paper will be sent to a third referee, who will decide whether or not to publish it.

The results of the evaluation process of the academic opinions will be irrevocable in all cases.

If the manuscript is accepted, it will be returned to the authors for correction. The corrected manuscript must be sent back to the editor of the Journal within 30 days.